Legal P2P opens for business

For a few fearful minutes in late 2004, iMesh co-founder Talmon Marco thought Garth Brooks had sunk his company.

Marco was in New York, showing off the technology behind the new iMesh peer-to-peer music service slated for release this Tuesday. The software was supposed to identify and block virtually any copyrighted song being downloaded from peer-to-peer networks. But this time, a Garth Brooks song picked at random seemed to download without any problem.

Bracing himself while sitting in a conference room with a team of lawyers from the EMI Group record label, Marco pushed “play.” The song started, and it was indeed the country crooner’s voice. But it was quickly interrupted by a burst of noise. The file was a fake, a “spoof” planted on the file-swapping networks to discourage pirates, and it turned out that Marco’s software had correctly let it through its filter.

“That was a moment,” Marco said, shaking his head during an interview with CNET News.com last week. “I thought, ‘Of course, the one time it doesn’t work is the time it needs to work.'”

After a year of such near-disaster moments, skeptical record executives have finally declared themselves satisfied with the new iMesh, which will relaunch Tuesday as the first unregulated peer-to-peer network to turn itself into a paid music service. But now it faces an even tougher audience: 5 million iMesh users who are used to free music.

iMesh is the first of several “label approved” peer-to-peer networks hitting the market this year after long delays in their development. Mashboxx, created by former Grokster President Wayne Rosso, is also slated to go live this fall.

Marco’s company may provide a real test of file swappers’ loyalty. In the last week alone, more than 1.5 million people have downloaded the old iMesh software, according to Download.com, a software aggregation site operated by News.com parent CNET Networks. Many of those people were seeking free access to music and video, which will be sharply curtailed under iMesh’s new life as a $6.95 per month music subscription plan similar in many ways to those offered by Yahoo or Napster.

“If it’s trying to pull people over from the P2P world, it’s an important first step,” said GartnerG2 analyst Mike McGuire. “But meeting the basic bar that’s been set by legitimate services like iTunes or Rhapsody is going to be a real challenge.”

Limbos’ end
iMesh has occupied a unique role in the digital world for more than a year. Created by Marco and a handful of others in Israel, with work starting on the project as early as 1998, the company settled a lawsuit with the big record labels in July 2004. At that time, it agreed to turn itself into a paid music service similar to Napster or RealNetworks’ Rhapsody.

However, record labels agreed to let the old iMesh continue operating–even with millions of copyrighted songs being traded online–while the new service was being developed. In return, iMesh agreed to pay labels $4.1 million.

Chalk those unusual settlement terms up to two factors. First, when iMesh agreed to settle, it was long before the U.S. Supreme Court had tipped the legal balance back in favor of copyright holders, and record labels jumped at the chance to shut down another popular file-swapping network.

imesh

Also, iMesh had a secret weapon in Robert Summer, a former head of the Recording Industry Association of America who agreed to act as a consultant for the file-swapping company during settlement negotiations, and ultimately joined iMesh as executive chairman.

The alliance between the 70-year-old former record mogul and the scrappy Israeli technology company may be one of the oddest in digital music’s history of odd bedfellows. But Summer said he was convinced that iMesh was serious about becoming a copyright-respecting company, and it was his voice that helped convince his former colleagues to trust the technologists.

By the time a year had passed, and the copyright-friendly iMesh still hadn’t launched, those former colleagues were losing patience. iMesh has spent considerable time over the past year showing off incomplete versions of its software to show its progress, but Summer said the company was feeling intense pressure to get something out the door.

“There was a bit of a whisper campaign that was encouraging us to get it going and get the product out there,” Summer said. “But while we never ignored that or took it lightly…I understood that in an ultimate sense to be encouraging, to be a genuine interest in seeing us get it out there.”

Label executives say they’re happy with the results.

“There’s genuine excitement about the offering,” said Mitch Bainwol, CEO of the Recording Industry Association of America. “We’re hopeful that that P2P becomes a legitimate part of the distribution of music.”

Meet the new iMesh: iTunes plus MySpace

The new iMesh looks and acts a bit like the old file-swapping service, but it’s designed more with the successes of Apple Computer’s iTunes and the explosively popular MySpace social network in mind.

As before, the core of the service is searching for music. The vast majority of songs that are returned by any search are from


iMesh’s “premium” service, which means they will be available only by paying the $6.95 monthly fee, once the promotion period ends, or by buying them individually.

Like the basic subscription services from Yahoo, Napster and others, those downloaded songs will be locked to PCs, and cannot be transferred to iPods or other devices. A future version will let the songs be taken to some Windows-compatible devices, Marco said.

Robert SummerRobert Summer,
executive chair,iMesh

The software also searches the Gnutella peer-to-peer network, often finding results on other people’s hard drives that aren’t legal to download. Those are identified and blocked as they are downloaded, but some songs from independent or unsigned artists can still be traded freely.

The service still will allow downloads of video, but only of files 15 minutes in length, or 50 megabytes in size, far too small to support a Hollywood movie or even a television show.

To help keep people onboard, the company has transformed half of the service into a social-networking application that lets users find other people by age, gender, geographic region or musical tastes. People can browse the songs on each other’s hard drives, and soon will be able to send instant messages to each other.

The subscription service, which will be free to users for the first month or two, initially will be available only in the United States, which represents about 40 percent of iMesh’s consumers, Marco said.

Who’s next, if anybody?
The big question in iMesh’s wake is whether any of the other big file-swapping services will be able to follow suit.

iMesh’s onetime peers, such as eDonkey and Lime Wire, are facing new lawsuits by a record industry and Hollywood studios given new legal strength by last summer’s Supreme Court decision. Several of those other file-swapping companies are exploring mergers with existing music services, or creating their own filtered service like iMesh’s.

Bainwol declined to comment on the organizations’ ongoing negotiations with peer-to-peer companies.

But executives at both Mashboxx and iMesh say it turned out to be a much harder task to create a legal, filtered service than they expected. Anyone trying to do the same thing has at least a year of technology development and contract negotiation with record labels ahead, they say.

“Anyone who’s not well down the path today is in trouble,” predicted Mashboxx’s Rosso.

“We thought it would be difficult, but we didn’t realize how difficult,” agreed iMesh’s Marco. For the others, he said, “it’s too late.”

Check Also

‘Stranger Things’ Musical Finally Brings Justice for Barb

Hawkins, Indiana, may be home to murderous monsters, but it’s way less threatening when you toss in campy musical numbers and silly wigs.  You get plenty of both in Stranger Sings: The Parody Musical, which bills itself as a “hilarious ‘upside down’ take” on the hit Netflix horror drama about young friends facing supernatural forces …

Leave a Reply