Old school meets new school: Yamaha A

The Yamaha A-S801 recalls the look of a traditional integrated amplifier from the 1970s or 1980s. I love its clean lines, minimal controls, and the build quality of this 100-watt-per-channel amp is at least on par with the best specimens from the glory days. Nice, but it also sports features the classics lacked, like a built-in digital converter, and a remote control!

81-89juod8l-sl1500.jpg

Yamaha A-S801 amp and remote


Yamaha

Like most integrated amps, the A-S801 is so dead simple to use you’ll probably never have to crack open the owner’s manual to figure out how to play your music. In 2015 that’s hardly a given with AV receivers. One feature I’ve always admired on Yamaha amps is the A-S801’s variable loudness control, it’s great for folks who occasionally listen at hushed, late-night volume, because this single control lets you add just the right amount of bass and treble that would otherwise be lost with quiet listening.

You also get bass and treble control knobs you can fiddle with to your heart’s content, and fine-tune the tonal balance of your speakers or headphones. Connectivity runs to five analog inputs and two “tape” outputs, plus a moving-magnet phono input. Digital inputs are USB, coaxial and optical, and there’s an RCA subwoofer output jack, along with two pairs of heavy-duty speaker cable binding posts. My review sample was finished in black, but it’s also available in silver, and I think Yamaha amps have always looked best in silver.

The chassis measures 17.1 by 6 by 15.25 inches, and it weighs 26.7 pounds — build quality feels especially solid. The slender remote handles most functions, but not bass, treble or variable loudness.

To get acquainted with the amp’s sound I watched “Seymour: An Introduction,” Ethan Hawke’s documentary film about a brilliant piano teacher, Seymour Bernstein. Watching Bernstein with his students delving into the minutia of piano technique, the Blu-ray’s sound over Hifiman Edition X headphones was so open and big I had to stop and make sure the sound wasn’t coming over the speakers — it was that good. That sort of out-of-head sound from headphones is rare, but the Edition X’s sound, paired with the A-S801 was sublime.

My KEF LS50 speakers turned out to be a good match with the amp when I played Bruce Springsteen’s recently remastered “Darkness on the Edge of Town” CD. The bass from these little speakers went down to the floor, and I loved the way the Boss’ rhythm section locked in. The band was tight, and Springsteen’s vocals really connected with me.

c050146.jpgc050146.jpg

Yamaha A-S801’s heavy-duty speaker cable connectors


Steve Guttenberg/CNET

I next compared the A-S801’s built-in digital converter with the Arcam irDAC converter, and while I heard differences, they weren’t huge. The irDAC sounded more expansive and richer, but it costs nearly as much as the A-S801. Still, it’s worth noting the A-S801’s USB input supports DSD (2.8MHz and 5.6MHz) and PCM (384kHz/32-bit) formats.

The A-S801 managed to generate surprisingly deep and punchy bass with Aphex Twin’s “Computer Controlled Acoustic Instruments” album, the little LS50s really strutted their stuff with this amp. The clarity and precision of the sound of each percussion instrument stood out in bold relief. After switching over to the NAD C-316BEE integrated amp ($380), the soundstage dimensions shrank and dynamics flattened because the C 316BEE significantly diminished the LS50s’ capabilities. With Fleet Foxes “Sun Giant” album, the lush harmonies and acoustic instruments had a more organic, full-bodied tonality with the A-S801; the C-316BEE sounded rather anemic and flat by comparison.

Still, the C 316BEE is a lot less than half the price of the A-S801. For the money I still recommend the C 316BEE, but if you can afford to step up, the A-S801 is a clear winner.

Encouraged by what I heard with the LS50s, I was eager to try the A-S801 with my Magnepan .7 speakers, which are harder to drive than the LS50s, and notoriously finicky about amps. The A-S801 faced the challenge head on, and sounded even better over the .7 panel speakers than it did with the LS50s.

Sticking with the .7 speakers, I next compared the A-S801 with the Schiit Ragnarok integrated amp ($1,699). That one added more oomph to the sound; the A-S801 sounded a bit lightweight after spending time with the Ragnarok. It’s a better sounding amp in every way, but lacks a lot of the A-S801’s features, such as a built-in digital converter and a remote.

The Yamaha A-S801 sells for $899.95 in the US.

Check Also

The Absolute Best Horror Movies on Netflix

Halloween is upon us, so it’s time to watch horror movies and horror movies only. Netflix is home to such a stunning range of horror movies that this introduction is going to be a list of the titles that didn’t make the main recommendations. Try Blood Red Sky (2021), a British-German action horror; Forgotten (2017), a South …

Old school meets new school: Yamaha A

Stereo integrated amplifiers are as old school as you can get. They’re pretty basic; for decades integrated amps just had a volume control, inputs for CD, radio, “aux,” and sometimes a phono input for a turntable. There might be bass and treble controls, but most amps didn’t even come with a remote control! My no-frills NAD C 316BEE, 40 watt per channel amp is the perfect expression of a classic integrated amp that’s still being made today. Yamaha’s newly introduced A-S801 looks like a clone of a Yamaha integrated amp from the 1970s or 1980s, but the features lineup is very much of our time. The Yamaha A-S801 has a $1,000 MSRP in the US.

dsc7290a.jpg
Yamaha A-S801
Steve Guttenberg/CNET

The A-S801’s front panel and the remote control were so logically laid out I didn’t have to consult the owner’s manual even once to get sound out of this thing! I hooked up my Oppo BDP-105 Blu-ray player’s coaxial digital output, and a pair of GoldenEar Technology Triton Five tower speakers and started playing tunes. The sound was clean, bass had plenty of oomph, and stereo imaging was big and broad.

The A-S801’s connectivity runs the gamut, there’s six sets of stereo RCA analog inputs including a phono input for moving magnet cartridges; two sets of stereo RCA analog outputs; a RCA subwoofer output jack; three digital inputs, Toslink, coaxial and USB; and two sets (A+B) of heavy-duty speaker binding posts. Built-in digital converters handle ultra-high resolution 384 kHz/32 bit PCM and 5.6 MHz DSD files! If you need to go wireless order the optional Yamaha YBA-11 Bluetooth adaptor ($70).

The A-S801’s back panel has an impedance selector switch for high (6 or 8 Ohm) or low impedance (4 Ohm) speakers. The A-S801 is rated at 100 watts per channel, and weighs a hefty 26.7 pounds! That’s a good indication of solid build quality and the components packed inside the chassis. Most 7 x 100 watt receivers weigh less than the A-S801, for example, Yamaha’s RX-V777BT AV receiver weighs just 23.2 pounds! Most of the weight differential comes from the A-S801’s larger power transformer, power supply capacitors and heat sinks.

In addition to the usual front panel controls -volume, bass, treble, speaker A/B switching, etc. – the A-S801 sports a variable loudness control. That one lets you tailor the tonal balance for late night listening by gently boosting bass and treble to make up for losses associated with quiet listening levels.

I compared the A-S801 with my NAD C 316BEE integrated amp, hooked up to the GoldenEar Technology Triton Five tower speakers. The C 316BEE’s sound had more body and weight, the A-S801 was leaner and lighter in tone. Classical violinist Joshua Bell’s bluegrass infused Short Trip Home album sound was “riper” and more voluptuous over the C 316BEE, but more accurate over the A-S801.

With “Hard Times” from the new AC-DC album Rock or Bust the C 316BEE rocked harder, and Phil Rudd’s mighty kick drum had superior kick. The C 316BEE sells for less than half the A-S801’s price, but the C 316BEE lacks features like the built-in digital converter, phono preamp, and A & B speaker switching. The two amps sound different, but both provide good sound.

The A-S801’s stereo home theater trials commenced with Avatar, and the amp handled the film’s scale and impact with ease. Dialogue was clear and natural, and when the Hammerhead Titanothere lets off some steam in the jungle and knocks down a few trees the A-S801’s power reserves were never in doubt.

“Lionsong” from Bjork’s new “Vulnicura” album in high-resolution digital is a gorgeous recording, and its thunderous beats pumping against strings took my breath away. Bjork’s multi-tracked vocals were front and center in the mix.

I also compared the sound of a pair of NAD Viso HP50 headphones plugged into my iPod Classic and the A-S801, and the amp made those headphones sound like much better headphones. So if you’ve invested in a decent pair of headphones, but you only play them in your cell phone, the A-S801 will be an easy upgrade.

While the A-S801’s competence was never in doubt it lacks the more “robust” character of the $1,295 Rogue Sphinx amp’s sound. The Sphinx is a cool running vacuum tube/Class D hybrid design that sounds like a classic 1980s high-end integrated amplifier. The Sphinx is rated at 100 watts per channel for 8 ohm speakers, 200 watts per for 4 ohm speakers. There’s more body and soul to the Sphinx sound, the A-S801 is tonally cooler and lighter on its feet. Which one is better? I prefer the Sphinx, but tastes vary, you might go for the A-S801.

Check Also

The Absolute Best Horror Movies on Netflix

Halloween is upon us, so it’s time to watch horror movies and horror movies only. Netflix is …

Leave a Reply